{"id":628,"date":"2015-06-18T09:01:01","date_gmt":"2015-06-18T09:01:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/?p=628"},"modified":"2021-12-29T21:25:48","modified_gmt":"2021-12-29T21:25:48","slug":"appeals-court-makes-its-decision-in-favor-of-dunston","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/appeals-court-makes-its-decision-in-favor-of-dunston\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeals Court Makes Its Decision In Favor of Dunston"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jacob-Szafranski-unwilling-father.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" size-medium wp-image-629 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jacob-Szafranski-unwilling-father-300x278.jpg\" alt=\"Jacob Szafranski unwilling father\" width=\"300\" height=\"278\" srcset=\"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jacob-Szafranski-unwilling-father-300x278.jpg 300w, https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jacob-Szafranski-unwilling-father-158x146.jpg 158w, https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jacob-Szafranski-unwilling-father-50x46.jpg 50w, https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jacob-Szafranski-unwilling-father-81x75.jpg 81w, https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jacob-Szafranski-unwilling-father.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width:767px) 300px, 300px\" \/><\/a>This legal battle, which turned heads months ago, intrigued many since it regarded a custody dispute over frozen embryos. However, with third-party reproduction gaining more traction in the era of the \u201cmodern family,\u201d cases like this are becoming more common.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, this has been coined a \u201clandmark case\u201d and may have the trajectory to set precedence for future cases similar to this one.<\/p>\n<p>An appellate court in Illinois ruled in favor of Karla Dunston, 43.<\/p>\n<p>Five years ago, Dunston froze her embryos prior to her cancer treatments for lymphoma beginning in 2010. As a doctor, she had the foresight knowing that the treatments could render her infertile so she made a proactive choice to harvest her eggs.<\/p>\n<p>At the time, her now ex-boyfriend, Jacob Szafranski, helped by donating his sperm.<\/p>\n<p>A total of three embryos were cryopreserved.<\/p>\n<p>While Dunston wants to proceed to build a family, Szafranski, on the other hand, tossed up legal blockades saying that this was in clear violation of his own rights \u201cnot to procreate.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The couple broke up several months following the embryo creation, and it was at that time the ex-boyfriend did not want these embryos used.<\/p>\n<p>Reporter, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/news\/us-news\/appellate-court-sides-chicago-woman-landmark-embryo-case-n374871\">Elizabeth Chuck, for NBC NEWS<\/a> writes, \u201cDunston is now in remission. Her attorney says she is not asking for money or support from Szafranski \u2014 just the ability to have kids.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>When Szafranski agreed to help, this solved an important issue, and quite frankly, hope for the future when undergoing cancer treatments.<\/p>\n<p>Abram Moore, Dunston\u2019s attorney, told NBC in a statement, \u201cThese three embryos represent Dr. Dunston\u2019s last chance to have children that share her genetic material. Mr. Szafranski agreed to create these embryos \u2026 so that Dr. Dunston could use them to attempt to have children if she survived cancer.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Of course, Szafranski is disheartened by the ruling. He told NBC Chicago, \u201cI don\u2019t think anyone should ever have their right to decide when and how they become a parent decided for them, and this is exactly what this is doing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In my legal opinion, the appellate court got it right. Szafranski agreed to assist Dunston whether he was a sperm donor or a parent. They discussed both options, and it looks as if he is more of a sperm donor.<\/p>\n<p>The ex-boyfriend knew fully well that this could be her last chance to have biological children, and he decided to help her. Throughout this legal battle, their agreement never changed. The only thing that\u2019s changed is Szafranski and his position. And still, it wasn\u2019t enough to persuade the court.<\/p>\n<p>Szafranski\u2019s attorney, Brian Schroeder, informed NBC Chicago that he has intentions to appeal this case to the Illinois Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p>Chuck interviewed Susan Crockin, who teaches reproductive law at Georgetown Law Center. She described their appeals as an uphill battle.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe court was pretty clear in finding that there was an oral contract in which Dunston said, \u2018Even if we are not together, you may use the embryos\u2019 \u2014 essentially being a sperm donor,\u2019 she told NBC News, adding that there are probably less than two dozen cases on record concerning custody of frozen embryos.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sperm donors have no legal parental responsibilities or financial obligations, Chuck reported.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe court found they agreed she could use the embryos, regardless of whether they had a relationship or he was going to be considered a donor. That\u2019s why the outcome at both the trial and the appellate level is fairly straightforward,\u201d Crockin told NBC.<\/p>\n<p>In the article, the Sofia Vergara and Nick Loeb\u2019s legal wrestle was briefly mentioned. Loeb wants custody of the embryos.<\/p>\n<p>But these two cases are not similar. Yes, they do involve frozen embryos, but there is a crystal clear difference. As mentioned earlier, for Dunston, this was her \u201clast chance\u201d to have a biological child.<\/p>\n<div class=\"rg_di rg_el\" style=\"width: 241px; height: 183px; padding-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 4px; display: inline-block;\" data-ved=\"0CB0QMygAMABqFQoTCMqA-ryrlcYCFYgxiAodF7sBOg\" data-ri=\"0\" data-row=\"0\"><\/div>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This legal battle, which <span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,13,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ivf","category-sperm-donation-2","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=628"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/628\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}