{"id":524,"date":"2015-04-06T23:22:28","date_gmt":"2015-04-06T23:22:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/?p=524"},"modified":"2021-12-29T21:36:02","modified_gmt":"2021-12-29T21:36:02","slug":"a-breakthrough-for-gay-parental-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/a-breakthrough-for-gay-parental-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"A Breakthrough for Gay Parental Rights"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Gay-Dad-Paternity-leave1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"  wp-image-533 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Gay-Dad-Paternity-leave1.jpg\" alt=\"Gay Dad Paternity leave\" width=\"254\" height=\"170\" srcset=\"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Gay-Dad-Paternity-leave1.jpg 127w, https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Gay-Dad-Paternity-leave1-50x33.jpg 50w, https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Gay-Dad-Paternity-leave1-112x75.jpg 112w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width:767px) 254px, 254px\" \/><\/a>To counter last week\u2019s post about gay men being denied parental rights, here\u2019s a story from the opposite end of the spectrum.<br \/>\nThis week the Labour Court in Durban, South Africa ruled that gay men who become fathers through surrogacy are eligible for maternity leave when the baby is born.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s revise that by saying they are \u201centitled\u201d to it.<br \/>\nThis is a trailblazing judgment.<br \/>\nIn Times Live, writers Ernest Mabuza and Nomahlubi Jordaan report, \u201cThe court ordered the applicant\u2019s employer, the State Information Technology Agency, to pay him for the two months\u2019 unpaid leave he took to care for his newborn baby.\u201d It continues, \u201cThe ruling, which has been welcomed by activist groups, would apply to heterosexual men as well.\u201d<br \/>\nIrvin Lawrence, who represented the applicant, said this ruling also transcends to heterosexual fathers who declare themselves as the primary caregiver to their newborn.<br \/>\nThe reason why Lawrence was brought into this court battle was that the petitioner\u2019s employer, State Information Technology Agency, refused to pay their staff member when he took two months off to care for his baby.<br \/>\nAround the globe, gay rights activists cheered this case on finding the actions of the employer to be unconscionable, knowing it was time for a change.<br \/>\nThe reporters wrote, \u201cThe father, whose identity cannot be revealed to protect the privacy of the child, challenged his employer\u2019s refusal to grant him four months\u2019 paid maternity leave on the grounds that he was not the child\u2019s biological mother.\u201d They added, \u201cThe man married his partner in a civil union in 2010 and a year later the couple entered into an agreement with a woman to carry a baby for them.\u201d<br \/>\nFor the applicant, he conveyed to the court that he and his spouse agreed that he would undertake the role as the primary caregiver for their infant following the birth.<br \/>\nLawrence told reporters that the judge\u2019s ruling may spur an amendment to the Basic Conditions of Employment Act. In a new era of parenthood, descriptions and definitions must be expanded to include every facet of parenthood in the 21st century.<\/p>\n<p>In this particular case, the surrogacy agreement between the couple and the woman was a court order. The surrogate relinquished her parental rights, and the gay couple finalized their parentage order.<br \/>\nThe petitioner, preparing for the birth of his baby, requested \u201cpaid\u201d maternity leave for a total of four months.<br \/>\n\u201cThe State Information Technology Agency refused on the grounds that its policies and the Basic Conditions of Employment Act made provision for maternity leave only for female employees and were silent on leave for people who became parents through surrogacy,\u201d the reporters wrote.<br \/>\nThe employer indicated the employee could be offered what was called a leave for \u201cfamily responsibility\u201d or \u201cspecial unpaid leave.\u201d<br \/>\nAs time pushed on, the employer then offered a total of two months of paid adoption leave. The other two months the employee would choose to take off would be unpaid.<br \/>\n\u201cThe father said these terms constituted discrimination against gay men. The agency denied its policy was discriminatory and said maternity leave was due to, and a right of, only female employees,\u201d the article highlighted.<br \/>\nBut Judge David Gush thought otherwise.<br \/>\nGush\u2019s ruling stated the following: \u201cGiven these circumstances there is no reason why an employee in the position of the applicant should not be entitled to maternity leave and, equally, no reason why such maternity leave should not be for the same duration as the maternity leave to which a natural mother is entitled.\u201d<br \/>\nThe authors also wrote that the judge ordered the State Information Technology Agency to recognize civil unions and also forbid the company to discriminate against those who became parents through surrogacy.<br \/>\nAccording to Johan Meyer, a health manager at Out, he told the media, \u201cThis is a breakthrough for future cases and for LGBT rights. It means that they can enjoy equal rights.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Paternity-Leave-post.jpg\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To counter last week\u2019s po<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,1],"tags":[101,178,182,222],"class_list":["post-524","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-surrogacy-2","category-uncategorized","tag-gay-rights","tag-parental-rights","tag-paternity-leave","tag-surrogacy"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/524","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=524"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/524\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=524"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=524"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=524"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}