{"id":1442,"date":"2018-06-06T21:20:22","date_gmt":"2018-06-06T21:20:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/?p=1442"},"modified":"2018-06-08T21:22:09","modified_gmt":"2018-06-08T21:22:09","slug":"surprising-supreme-court-ruling-in-same-sex-wedding-cake-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/surprising-supreme-court-ruling-in-same-sex-wedding-cake-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Surprising Supreme Court Ruling In Same-Sex Wedding Cake Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-zh\">\u5bf9\u4e0d\u8d77\uff0c\u6b64\u5185\u5bb9\u53ea\u9002\u7528\u4e8e<a href=\"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1442\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-en\" title=\"English\">English<\/a>\u3002 For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In a narrow U.S. Supreme Court ruling on June 4, 2018, seven of the court&#8217;s nine justices upheld the rights of a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. While the verdict sparked concern in some circles that it opened the door to allow business owners to broadly discriminate against same-sex couples, gay rights advocates believe that the ruling itself was actually more narrow than that.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone  wp-image-1443 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/pexels-photo-408495-300x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"357\" height=\"238\" srcset=\"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/pexels-photo-408495-300x200.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/pexels-photo-408495-219x146.jpeg 219w, https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/pexels-photo-408495-50x33.jpeg 50w, https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/pexels-photo-408495-113x75.jpeg 113w, https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/pexels-photo-408495.jpeg 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width:767px) 357px, 357px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the underlying case, a baker, Jack Phillips, refused to bake a cake for a gay couple&#8217;s wedding. When the matter was challenged in a lower court, the court sided with the couple. This new Supreme Court ruling overturned that decision. However, rather than ruling that the First Amendment protects a baker&#8217;s right to refuse to make a wedding cake, as the baker contended, the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling seems to hinge on anti-religious sentiments expressed by members of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission (the &#8220;Commission.&#8221;).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In 2014, the Commission ruled that Phillips had broken Colorado&#8217;s public accommodations law. That ruling required him to bake cakes for same-sex weddings and meet certain other requirements including educating his staff on civil rights laws. The Supreme Court&#8217;s decision overruled those requirements. In its majority opinion, the court referenced what the justices perceived as the Commission&#8217;s clear and impermissible hostility toward Phillips&#8217; religious beliefs.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Same-sex advocacy groups do not believe this decision paved the way for all business owners to cite moral or religious grounds for refusing to provide goods and services to same-sex people. The majority recognized and stated that such a result would be wholly inconsistent with civil rights laws. Still, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi indicated that she intends to pursue federal non-discrimination legislation that would protect the rights of same-sex people and couples.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u5bf9\u4e0d\u8d77\uff0c\u6b64\u5185\u5bb9\u53ea\u9002\u7528\u4e8eEnglish\u3002 For t<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lgbt"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1442\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surrogacy-lawyer.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}